Hungary vs Morocco: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Morocco
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 88,248 t against 83,831 t in Morocco, a difference of 4,417 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 42nd and Morocco ranks 44th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Morocco in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41,116 t | 42,575 t | 1,459 t | Morocco |
| 1970s | 63,540 t | 55,494 t | 8,046 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 83,743 t | 71,584 t | 12,159 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 65,804 t | 79,335 t | 13,531 t | Morocco |
| 2000s | 63,292 t | 78,120 t | 14,828 t | Morocco |
| 2010s | 72,949 t | 101,355 t | 28,406 t | Morocco |
| 2020s | 77,338 t | 81,731 t | 4,393 t | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Morocco?
- Hungary, at 88,248 t against 83,831 t in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Morocco?
- 4,417 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Morocco?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Morocco rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 42nd and Morocco ranks 44th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).