India vs Russian Federation: Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- India
- Russian Federation
How they compare
India currently reports 3.13 million t against 2.97 million t in Russian Federation, a difference of 154,690 t.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
India ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 185 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.73 million t | 1.25 million t | 476,151 t | India |
| 2000s | 1.93 million t | 1.36 million t | 561,262 t | India |
| 2010s | 2.46 million t | 1.84 million t | 628,523 t | India |
| 2020s | 2.99 million t | 2.72 million t | 273,005 t | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen, India or Russian Federation?
- India, at 3.13 million t against 2.97 million t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen between India and Russian Federation?
- 154,690 t, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do India and Russian Federation rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen?
- India ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).