Israel vs Uruguay: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Israel
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 3,644 t against 2,539 t in Israel, a difference of 1,105 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Israel ranks 126th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 185 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,052 t | 5,948 t | 2,896 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 4,177 t | 5,227 t | 1,050 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 4,929 t | 5,747 t | 818 t | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 4,465 t | 5,776 t | 1,311 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 3,632 t | 5,061 t | 1,429 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 3,557 t | 5,694 t | 2,137 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 2,449 t | 5,217 t | 2,768 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Israel or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 3,644 t against 2,539 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Israel and Uruguay?
- 1,105 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Uruguay rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Israel ranks 126th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).