Italy vs Middle Africa: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Italy
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Italy currently reports 138,296 t against 136,065 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 2,231 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 27th and Middle Africa ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 117,653 t | 34,467 t | 83,186 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 119,968 t | 37,733 t | 82,235 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 129,405 t | 41,164 t | 88,241 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 132,072 t | 49,617 t | 82,455 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 125,762 t | 71,546 t | 54,216 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 123,443 t | 121,920 t | 1,522 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 137,035 t | 133,774 t | 3,261 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Italy or Middle Africa?
- Italy, at 138,296 t against 136,065 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Italy and Middle Africa?
- 2,231 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Middle Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Middle Africa rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Italy ranks 27th and Middle Africa ranks 7th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).