Jamaica vs Jordan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jamaica
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2,303 t against 2,180 t in Jamaica, a difference of 123 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 133rd and Jordan ranks 132nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,054 t | 853.8 t | 1,201 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 2,045 t | 752.59 t | 1,292 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 1,692 t | 1,156 t | 536.19 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 2,097 t | 1,268 t | 829.3 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 1,572 t | 1,369 t | 203.07 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,734 t | 1,896 t | 161.69 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 2,073 t | 2,254 t | 181.05 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Jamaica or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 2,303 t against 2,180 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Jamaica and Jordan?
- 123 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Jordan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Jamaica ranks 133rd and Jordan ranks 132nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).