Japan vs Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 59,094 t against 53,111 t in Japan, a difference of 5,983 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 55th and Sudan ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56,280 t | 68,737 t | 12,457 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 54,533 t | 68,193 t | 13,660 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 59,094 t against 53,111 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Sudan?
- 5,983 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 55th and Sudan ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).