Kazakhstan vs Viet Nam: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 245,719 t against 222,454 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 23,265 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 178,617 t | 57,174 t | 121,443 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 187,514 t | 109,099 t | 78,415 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 211,065 t | 184,557 t | 26,508 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 235,264 t | 236,622 t | 1,358 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 245,719 t against 222,454 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Viet Nam?
- 23,265 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Viet Nam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Viet Nam rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).