Kiribati vs Malta: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 14.48 t against 13.7 t in Kiribati, a difference of 0.78 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 187th and Malta ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.82 t | 78.93 t | 69.12 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 14.48 t | 89.99 t | 75.51 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 12.5 t | 102.76 t | 90.26 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 10.15 t | 96.32 t | 86.17 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 11.98 t | 105.51 t | 93.53 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 18.65 t | 95.82 t | 77.16 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 14.37 t | 19.35 t | 4.98 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Kiribati or Malta?
- Malta, at 14.48 t against 13.7 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Kiribati and Malta?
- 0.78 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Kiribati ranks 187th and Malta ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).