Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Viet Nam: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.75 million t
in 2023
Viet Nam
245,719 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th
Viet Nam rank
18th

Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Viet Nam
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.75 million t against 245,719 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 1.50 million t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 7.1 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 10 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1960s 626,731 t 41,769 t 584,963 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 769,524 t 43,703 t 725,820 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 847,518 t 41,577 t 805,941 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 842,075 t 53,708 t 788,367 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.04 million t 109,099 t 934,887 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1.46 million t 184,557 t 1.28 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.74 million t 236,622 t 1.50 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Viet Nam?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.75 million t against 245,719 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Viet Nam?
1.50 million t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Viet Nam?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Viet Nam rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Viet Nam: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/viet-nam-2/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Viet Nam: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).