Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 11,118 t against 9,536 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1,582 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,452 t | 2,952 t | 10,500 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 7,685 t | 7,216 t | 469.75 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 8,090 t | 10,559 t | 2,469 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 12,261 t | 11,008 t | 1,253 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Sierra Leone?
- Latvia, at 11,118 t against 9,536 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 1,582 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).