Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 33,082 t against 29,983 t in Lithuania, a difference of 3,099 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,551 t | 16,386 t | 2,165 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 16,790 t | 19,889 t | 3,098 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 26,289 t | 24,920 t | 1,369 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 30,620 t | 38,784 t | 8,164 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 33,082 t against 29,983 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
- 3,099 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).