Malta vs New Caledonia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malta
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 14.48 t against 12.58 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.9 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 172nd and New Caledonia ranks 175th of 185 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78.93 t | 20.33 t | 58.6 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 89.99 t | 29.28 t | 60.71 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 102.76 t | 34.49 t | 68.27 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 96.32 t | 32.26 t | 64.06 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 105.51 t | 25.47 t | 80.04 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 95.82 t | 20.74 t | 75.07 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 19.35 t | 18.99 t | 0.3535 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Malta or New Caledonia?
- Malta, at 14.48 t against 12.58 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Malta and New Caledonia?
- 1.9 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and New Caledonia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Malta ranks 172nd and New Caledonia ranks 175th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).