Mauritius vs Suriname: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mauritius
- Suriname
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 785.11 t against 730.71 t in Suriname, a difference of 54.4 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 948.08 t | 316.35 t | 631.73 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1,126 t | 451.83 t | 673.78 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1,006 t | 619.2 t | 386.51 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 892.11 t | 671.89 t | 220.22 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 864.7 t | 657.14 t | 207.56 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 809.59 t | 936.81 t | 127.22 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 714.22 t | 788.6 t | 74.38 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Mauritius or Suriname?
- Mauritius, at 785.11 t against 730.71 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Mauritius and Suriname?
- 54.4 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Mauritius ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).