Melanesia vs Mongolia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Melanesia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 7,764 t against 6,678 t in Melanesia, a difference of 1,086 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Melanesia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 120th and Mongolia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,461 t | 3,073 t | 612.62 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 3,087 t | 4,061 t | 973.3 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 3,789 t | 8,263 t | 4,473 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 4,284 t | 6,093 t | 1,809 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 5,233 t | 6,318 t | 1,085 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 6,541 t | 9,255 t | 2,714 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 6,783 t | 7,805 t | 1,022 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Melanesia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 7,764 t against 6,678 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Melanesia and Mongolia?
- 1,086 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Mongolia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Melanesia ranks 120th and Mongolia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).