Morocco vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Morocco
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 90,889 t against 83,831 t in Morocco, a difference of 7,058 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Morocco ranks 44th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42,575 t | 57,785 t | 15,210 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 55,494 t | 79,047 t | 23,553 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 71,584 t | 85,053 t | 13,469 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 99,845 t | 78,383 t | 21,462 t | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Morocco or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 90,889 t against 83,831 t in Morocco as of 1991.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Morocco and Yugoslav SFR?
- 7,058 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Morocco and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Morocco ranks 44th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).