Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Slovenia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 4,903 t against 4,545 t in Slovenia, a difference of 358 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 116th and Slovenia ranks 118th of 186 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,192 t | 3,186 t | 5.98 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 4,139 t | 3,371 t | 768.22 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 5,023 t | 4,333 t | 689.8 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 5,127 t | 4,609 t | 517.82 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Papua New Guinea or Slovenia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 4,903 t against 4,545 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
- 358 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 116th and Slovenia ranks 118th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).