Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Syrian Arab Republic: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen

Small island developing States (SIDS)
68,651 t
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
39,608 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
8th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
10th

Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
  • Syrian Arab Republic
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 68,651 t against 39,608 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 29,043 t.

That makes Small island developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 1.7 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 10th of 18 groups.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small island developing States (SIDS) Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 37,725 t 33,779 t 3,947 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1970s 52,323 t 30,498 t 21,825 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1980s 60,899 t 37,980 t 22,919 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1990s 53,818 t 48,540 t 5,278 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2000s 59,039 t 57,549 t 1,490 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2010s 67,248 t 44,560 t 22,688 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 66,089 t 33,223 t 32,865 t Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Small island developing States (SIDS) or Syrian Arab Republic?
Small island developing States (SIDS), at 68,651 t against 39,608 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Small island developing States (SIDS) and Syrian Arab Republic?
29,043 t, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 10th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Syrian Arab Republic: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/small-island-developing-states-sids/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/small-island-developing-states-sids/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Syrian Arab Republic: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).