South Sudan vs Tunisia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- South Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 15,219 t against 14,745 t in Tunisia, a difference of 474 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tunisia ahead.
South Sudan ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13,708 t | 26,938 t | 13,230 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 14,580 t | 21,160 t | 6,579 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, South Sudan or Tunisia?
- South Sudan, at 15,219 t against 14,745 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 474 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- South Sudan ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).