Bhutan vs Croatia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Croatia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2.1 kg/ha against 2.09 kg/ha in Croatia, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 64th and Croatia ranks 65th of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.37 kg/ha | 1.93 kg/ha | 0.564 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2000s | 1.83 kg/ha | 2.68 kg/ha | 0.8449 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 2.32 kg/ha | 2.82 kg/ha | 0.501 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2020s | 2.09 kg/ha | 2.37 kg/ha | 0.277 kg/ha | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bhutan or Croatia?
- Bhutan, at 2.1 kg/ha against 2.09 kg/ha in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bhutan and Croatia?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Croatia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 64th and Croatia ranks 65th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).