Bhutan vs Peru: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 2.11 kg/ha against 2.1 kg/ha in Bhutan, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Bhutan ranks 64th and Peru ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.41 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.0269 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 1.43 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | 0.1078 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 1.35 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | 0.0304 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1990s | 1.33 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.0456 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2000s | 1.83 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | 0.1847 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 2.32 kg/ha | 1.89 kg/ha | 0.4246 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 2.09 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | 0.0223 kg/ha | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bhutan or Peru?
- Peru, at 2.11 kg/ha against 2.1 kg/ha in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bhutan and Peru?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Peru rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 64th and Peru ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).