Brazil vs Estonia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Brazil
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 1.03 kg/ha against 0.9827 kg/ha in Brazil, a difference of 0.0473 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Brazil ranks 123rd and Estonia ranks 120th of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5015 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | 0.663 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.4112 kg/ha | 0.6533 kg/ha | 0.2421 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.5238 kg/ha | 0.5858 kg/ha | 0.062 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.8558 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.2245 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Brazil or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 1.03 kg/ha against 0.9827 kg/ha in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Brazil and Estonia?
- 0.0473 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Estonia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Brazil ranks 123rd and Estonia ranks 120th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).