Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Costa Rica
1.38 kg/ha
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.36 kg/ha
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
96th

Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.38 kg/ha against 1.36 kg/ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5502 kg/ha 0.9579 kg/ha 0.4078 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1970s 0.9782 kg/ha 1.18 kg/ha 0.201 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1980s 1.32 kg/ha 1.12 kg/ha 0.2024 kg/ha Costa Rica
1990s 1.49 kg/ha 0.9768 kg/ha 0.5134 kg/ha Costa Rica
2000s 1.4 kg/ha 0.9237 kg/ha 0.4777 kg/ha Costa Rica
2010s 1.53 kg/ha 1.1 kg/ha 0.4257 kg/ha Costa Rica
2020s 1.41 kg/ha 1.64 kg/ha 0.2233 kg/ha Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
Costa Rica, at 1.38 kg/ha against 1.36 kg/ha in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
0.02 kg/ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Costa Rica ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/costa-rica/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/costa-rica/zimbabwe/">Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).