Cuba vs Ethiopia PDR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 1.15 kg/ha against 1.15 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 110th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7129 kg/ha | 0.7233 kg/ha | 0.0104 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 0.9587 kg/ha | 0.8873 kg/ha | 0.0715 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1.13 kg/ha | 1.18 kg/ha | 0.0506 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 1 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | 0.2637 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 1.15 kg/ha against 1.15 kg/ha in Cuba as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cuba and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 110th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).