Estonia vs Panama: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Panama
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 1.03 kg/ha against 0.9864 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 0.0436 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 120th and Panama ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.16 kg/ha | 0.9891 kg/ha | 0.1754 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.6533 kg/ha | 0.9421 kg/ha | 0.2888 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.5858 kg/ha | 0.9064 kg/ha | 0.3206 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2020s | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.9639 kg/ha | 0.1163 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or Panama?
- Estonia, at 1.03 kg/ha against 0.9864 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and Panama?
- 0.0436 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Panama rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 120th and Panama ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).