Eswatini vs Ethiopia PDR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 1.15 kg/ha against 1.13 kg/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Eswatini ranks 112th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4554 kg/ha | 0.7233 kg/ha | 0.2679 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 0.9399 kg/ha | 0.8873 kg/ha | 0.0526 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 1.07 kg/ha | 1.18 kg/ha | 0.1057 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 1.11 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | 0.1582 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eswatini or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 1.15 kg/ha against 1.13 kg/ha in Eswatini as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eswatini and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Eswatini and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 112th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).