Ethiopia PDR vs Mauritius: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Mauritius
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 1.15 kg/ha against 1.14 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 109th and Mauritius ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7233 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.3584 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 0.8873 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | 0.2759 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1.18 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | 0.1413 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 1.27 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | 0.2472 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Mauritius?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 1.15 kg/ha against 1.14 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Mauritius?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Mauritius rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 109th and Mauritius ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).