Ethiopia vs Hungary: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 3.61 kg/ha against 3.31 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.3 kg/ha.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Hungary ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 35th and Hungary ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.28 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | 0.9811 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.51 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | 0.8134 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 2.55 kg/ha | 2.76 kg/ha | 0.2079 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 3.27 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | 0.1038 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 3.61 kg/ha against 3.31 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia and Hungary?
- 0.3 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Hungary?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Hungary rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 35th and Hungary ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).