Fiji, Republic of vs Georgia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Fiji, Republic of
- Georgia
How they compare
Fiji, Republic of currently reports 1.07 kg/ha against 1.06 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Fiji, Republic of ranks 116th and Georgia ranks 117th of 185 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji, Republic of | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4506 kg/ha | 0.9998 kg/ha | 0.5492 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.4957 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.5786 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.8903 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | 0.1503 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | 0.0437 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Fiji, Republic of or Georgia?
- Fiji, Republic of, at 1.07 kg/ha against 1.06 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Fiji, Republic of and Georgia?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Fiji, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji, Republic of and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Fiji, Republic of and Georgia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Fiji, Republic of ranks 116th and Georgia ranks 117th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).