Fiji vs North Macedonia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Fiji
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 1.1 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4506 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 0.8486 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 0.4957 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | 0.8324 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.8903 kg/ha | 1.29 kg/ha | 0.4018 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 1 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | 0.1412 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Fiji or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 1.1 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Fiji and North Macedonia?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and North Macedonia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).