Georgia vs Mozambique: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 1.08 kg/ha against 1.06 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 117th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9998 kg/ha | 0.2119 kg/ha | 0.7879 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.4756 kg/ha | 0.5986 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1.04 kg/ha | 0.8296 kg/ha | 0.211 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1.05 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | 0.0971 kg/ha | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Georgia or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 1.08 kg/ha against 1.06 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Georgia and Mozambique?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mozambique?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Mozambique rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 117th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).