Guyana vs Nepal: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Guyana
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 3.79 kg/ha against 3.65 kg/ha in Guyana, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.
Guyana ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 28th of 185 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.04 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | 0.5726 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 1970s | 1.08 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | 0.4603 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 1980s | 1.25 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.2334 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 1990s | 1.43 kg/ha | 1.7 kg/ha | 0.2709 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 2000s | 1.55 kg/ha | 2.05 kg/ha | 0.5045 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 2010s | 2.52 kg/ha | 2.72 kg/ha | 0.1984 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3.51 kg/ha | 3.57 kg/ha | 0.0649 kg/ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Guyana or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 3.79 kg/ha against 3.65 kg/ha in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Guyana and Nepal?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Nepal rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Guyana ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 28th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).