Japan vs Lithuania: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.38 kg/ha against 2.24 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.55 kg/ha | 1.35 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 2.36 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | 0.5984 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 2.23 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | 0.025 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 2.28 kg/ha | 2.46 kg/ha | 0.1839 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Japan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 2.38 kg/ha against 2.24 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Japan and Lithuania?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Japan ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).