Kazakhstan vs Qatar: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Qatar
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 1.25 kg/ha against 1.21 kg/ha in Qatar, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 99th and Qatar ranks 101st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.02 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.1271 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2000s | 1.18 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | 0.2312 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2010s | 1.28 kg/ha | 0.9099 kg/ha | 0.3662 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1.37 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.2857 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kazakhstan or Qatar?
- Kazakhstan, at 1.25 kg/ha against 1.21 kg/ha in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kazakhstan and Qatar?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Qatar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Qatar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 99th and Qatar ranks 101st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).