Kuwait vs Slovenia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kuwait
- Slovenia
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 3.9 kg/ha against 3.85 kg/ha in Slovenia, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 25th and Slovenia ranks 27th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.6 kg/ha | 2.8 kg/ha | 0.1988 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 3.66 kg/ha | 3.14 kg/ha | 0.5184 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 3.84 kg/ha | 3.63 kg/ha | 0.2113 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 3.85 kg/ha | 3.91 kg/ha | 0.0635 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kuwait or Slovenia?
- Kuwait, at 3.9 kg/ha against 3.85 kg/ha in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kuwait and Slovenia?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Slovenia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kuwait ranks 25th and Slovenia ranks 27th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).