Latvia vs Rwanda: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.66 kg/ha against 1.65 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 84th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.47 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.6 kg/ha | 1.53 kg/ha | 0.071 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.3 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.4129 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 1.84 kg/ha | 1.61 kg/ha | 0.2296 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 1.66 kg/ha against 1.65 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 84th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).