Lithuania vs Sri Lanka: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.38 kg/ha against 2.31 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.35 kg/ha | 0.5867 kg/ha | 0.7651 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 1.76 kg/ha | 0.9256 kg/ha | 0.8372 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 2.2 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.4859 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 2.46 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 0.174 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Lithuania or Sri Lanka?
- Lithuania, at 2.38 kg/ha against 2.31 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).