Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.7 kg/ha
in 2023
Pakistan
4.33 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
20th
Pakistan rank
22nd

Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Pakistan
1234196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 4.33 kg/ha against 1.7 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 2.63 kg/ha.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 2.5 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 22nd of 29 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9911 kg/ha 1.16 kg/ha 0.1663 kg/ha Pakistan
1970s 1.05 kg/ha 1.52 kg/ha 0.4685 kg/ha Pakistan
1980s 1.15 kg/ha 1.93 kg/ha 0.7841 kg/ha Pakistan
1990s 1.18 kg/ha 2.38 kg/ha 1.2 kg/ha Pakistan
2000s 1.32 kg/ha 2.75 kg/ha 1.43 kg/ha Pakistan
2010s 1.52 kg/ha 3.31 kg/ha 1.8 kg/ha Pakistan
2020s 1.67 kg/ha 3.96 kg/ha 2.29 kg/ha Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 4.33 kg/ha against 1.7 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
2.63 kg/ha, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).