Luxembourg vs Tajikistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 5.39 kg/ha against 5.13 kg/ha in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.26 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 15th and Tajikistan ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.04 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 5.09 kg/ha | 4.65 kg/ha | 0.4454 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 5.43 kg/ha | 5.32 kg/ha | 0.1083 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Luxembourg or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 5.39 kg/ha against 5.13 kg/ha in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 0.26 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Tajikistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 15th and Tajikistan ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).