Montenegro vs Singapore: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.901 kg/ha against 0.7987 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.1023 kg/ha.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 133rd and Singapore ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.6 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | 8.4 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 3.45 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.7769 kg/ha | 0.9621 kg/ha | 0.1853 kg/ha | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Montenegro or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.901 kg/ha against 0.7987 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Montenegro and Singapore?
- 0.1023 kg/ha, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Singapore?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Singapore rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 133rd and Singapore ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).