Puerto Rico vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Puerto Rico
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 2.18 kg/ha against 2.13 kg/ha in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 60th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8283 kg/ha | 1.31 kg/ha | 0.479 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 0.752 kg/ha | 1.84 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.6381 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 0.5718 kg/ha | 1.85 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Puerto Rico or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 2.18 kg/ha against 2.13 kg/ha in Puerto Rico as of 1991.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Puerto Rico and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Puerto Rico and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Puerto Rico ranks 60th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 59th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).