Saudi Arabia vs Serbia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Serbia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.78 kg/ha against 1.7 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.26 kg/ha | 1.87 kg/ha | 0.391 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 2.14 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 0.1193 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 1.69 kg/ha | 1.72 kg/ha | 0.0348 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Saudi Arabia or Serbia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1.78 kg/ha against 1.7 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Saudi Arabia and Serbia?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Serbia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).