Sierra Leone vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Sierra Leone
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.9524 kg/ha against 0.9353 kg/ha in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0171 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 127th and South Sudan ranks 125th of 186 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.04 kg/ha | 0.8384 kg/ha | 0.1982 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 1.09 kg/ha | 0.9321 kg/ha | 0.1544 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Sierra Leone or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.9524 kg/ha against 0.9353 kg/ha in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Sierra Leone and South Sudan?
- 0.0171 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Sierra Leone ranks 127th and South Sudan ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).