Slovakia vs Uzbekistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 8.28 kg/ha against 8.05 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Slovakia ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.99 kg/ha | 5.59 kg/ha | 0.6028 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 4.24 kg/ha | 6.3 kg/ha | 2.06 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 5.61 kg/ha | 6.68 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 7.49 kg/ha | 7.5 kg/ha | 0.016 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Slovakia or Uzbekistan?
- Slovakia, at 8.28 kg/ha against 8.05 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Slovakia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Uzbekistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).