Slovakia vs Viet Nam: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 8.28 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Viet Nam, a difference of 4.34 kg/ha.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 2.1 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Slovakia ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.99 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 4.24 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | 2.04 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 5.61 kg/ha | 3.15 kg/ha | 2.46 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 7.49 kg/ha | 3.78 kg/ha | 3.71 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Slovakia or Viet Nam?
- Slovakia, at 8.28 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Slovakia and Viet Nam?
- 4.34 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Viet Nam?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Viet Nam rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).