Sudan vs Tunisia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.4867 kg/ha against 0.4408 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.0459 kg/ha.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tunisia ahead.
Sudan ranks 154th and Tunisia ranks 151st of 185 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.587 kg/ha | 0.9366 kg/ha | 0.3496 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.5477 kg/ha | 0.7326 kg/ha | 0.1849 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Sudan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.4867 kg/ha against 0.4408 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Sudan and Tunisia?
- 0.0459 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Sudan ranks 154th and Tunisia ranks 151st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).