Togo vs Uganda: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Togo
- Uganda
How they compare
Togo currently reports 1.17 kg/ha against 1.17 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.
Togo ranks 105th and Uganda ranks 106th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7724 kg/ha | 0.6055 kg/ha | 0.1669 kg/ha | Togo |
| 1970s | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.8055 kg/ha | 0.264 kg/ha | Togo |
| 1980s | 0.8534 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.217 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1990s | 1.04 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | 0.1594 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 1.24 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | 0.002 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2010s | 1.18 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.0134 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 1.16 kg/ha | 1.22 kg/ha | 0.0538 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Togo or Uganda?
- Togo, at 1.17 kg/ha against 1.17 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Togo and Uganda?
- 0 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Togo and Uganda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Togo ranks 105th and Uganda ranks 106th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).