Afghanistan vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Afghanistan
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 16,656 t against 16,651 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 5 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 36th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 35th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,323 t | 10,847 t | 2,524 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 9,420 t | 14,753 t | 5,333 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 10,352 t | 15,771 t | 5,419 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 9,670 t | 14,223 t | 4,553 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Afghanistan or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 16,656 t against 16,651 t in Afghanistan as of 1991.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Afghanistan and Yugoslav SFR?
- 5 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Afghanistan and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Afghanistan ranks 36th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 35th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).