Angola vs Ecuador: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Angola
- Ecuador
How they compare
Angola currently reports 5,258 t against 4,835 t in Ecuador, a difference of 423 t.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Angola ranks 86th and Ecuador ranks 89th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,652 t | 2,151 t | 498.7 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 1,726 t | 2,213 t | 486.45 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 1,169 t | 2,271 t | 1,102 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 1,449 t | 2,858 t | 1,409 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2,396 t | 2,715 t | 318.89 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 4,113 t | 3,581 t | 532.08 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 5,051 t | 4,511 t | 539.89 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Angola or Ecuador?
- Angola, at 5,258 t against 4,835 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Angola and Ecuador?
- 423 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Ecuador rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Angola ranks 86th and Ecuador ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).