Angola vs Guatemala: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Angola
- Guatemala
How they compare
Angola currently reports 5,258 t against 5,112 t in Guatemala, a difference of 146 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 76th and Guatemala ranks 77th of 185 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,652 t | 56.96 t | 1,595 t | Angola |
| 1970s | 1,726 t | 157.11 t | 1,569 t | Angola |
| 1980s | 1,169 t | 440.19 t | 728.71 t | Angola |
| 1990s | 1,449 t | 690.14 t | 758.58 t | Angola |
| 2000s | 2,396 t | 1,136 t | 1,260 t | Angola |
| 2010s | 4,113 t | 2,760 t | 1,354 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 5,051 t | 4,776 t | 275.48 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Guatemala?
- Angola, at 5,258 t against 5,112 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Guatemala?
- 146 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Guatemala rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Angola ranks 76th and Guatemala ranks 77th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).