Argentina vs Czech Republic: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Argentina
- Czech Republic
How they compare
Czech Republic currently reports 16,573 t against 15,846 t in Argentina, a difference of 727 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czech Republic ahead.
Argentina ranks 38th and Czech Republic ranks 37th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Czech Republic in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Czech Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,345 t | 17,357 t | 3,012 t | Czech Republic |
| 2000s | 10,787 t | 13,645 t | 2,858 t | Czech Republic |
| 2010s | 12,089 t | 13,770 t | 1,681 t | Czech Republic |
| 2020s | 19,687 t | 16,220 t | 3,467 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Argentina or Czech Republic?
- Czech Republic, at 16,573 t against 15,846 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Argentina and Czech Republic?
- 727 t, with Czech Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Czech Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Czech Republic rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Argentina ranks 38th and Czech Republic ranks 37th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).